Enjoyment of Life
Davidson was involved in an auto accident that was caused by the other driver’s negligence. Davidson suffered injuries that made him unable to work for a year after the accident. He had a wife and family to support, and sued the negligent driver for his loss of wages. Davidson also wanted to include compensation for his loss of enjoyment of life, in not being able to pursue his hobbies of fishing and hunting as well, as often, as before the accident.
Did the Court rule FOR or AGAINST Davidson?