In progress toward safer cars, devices like seat belts were aimed at protecting you in a crash. Today, new safety technology is moving toward preventing an accident from happening at all.
"We are seeing a rapid shift from passive safety technology to active safety technology in modern cars," said senior analyst Karl Brauer of Kelley Blue Book. A lawsuit over rearview cameras and new ratings for collision warning and automatic braking systems highlight the trend toward accident prevention gear. Public interest groups last week sued the U.S. Department of Transportation for delaying federal requirements that all new cars have rearview cameras, which let a driver see what is behind a vehicle before backing up. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety also has expanded its testing programs to rate systems that sense an imminent collision and warn the driver and, in some cases, apply the brakes automatically.
By letting a driver see what is behind his vehicle, this feature can avoid particularly tragic accidents where parents or neighbors back over small children.These "backover" accidents cause an average of 292 deaths and 18,000 injuries a year, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. About 44 per cent of those killed are children under five. This is especially an issue for large vehicles like SUVs, pickups and minivans. Under congressional mandate to improve rear visibility, NHTSA and the Department of Transportation have repeatedly postponed the rule that all new cars must have backup cameras after automakers objected to the potential expense. Now consumer advocacy groups, including Consumers Union and Public Citizen, are suing the department to speed up this requirement.
Question: How much of an additional expense is this? The technology already exists. Now we just need the hardware and the installation. Given the fact that the manufacturers will simply pass the expense on to the consumer, and no doubt with some amount of markup, the “potential expense” argument seems a bit silly here.
Crash avoidance systems
First luxury cars, and now mid-priced vehicles, have added systems that warn a driver when a front-end crash is imminent and, in some cases, apply the brakes automatically. Kelley Blue Book's Brauer believes this is the most essential safety technology since seat belts and rollover-avoiding stability control. "The auto-brake functions that slow vehicles if they sense a car or pedestrian in the path of travel are the most important new safety features, he said. Car-pedestrian accidents especially cause so much personal injury."
The Insurance Institute tested 74 luxury and moderately priced 2013 and 2014 cars and SUVs that offer a forward collision warning system with or without autonomous braking. These systems often are optional rather than standard equipment. "Front crash protection systems can add a thousand dollars or more to the cost of a new car," said IIHS chief research officer David Zuby. "Our new ratings let consumers know which systems offer the most promise for the extra expense."
The Institute rated vehicles in three categories -- superior, advanced and basic. Each rating depends on the equipment offered and its performance in braking tests at 12 mph and 25 mph to simulate city driving. Here is a closer look at what each rating means and which cars fell into that category:
- Superior: To win this highest rating, a
vehicle needed to offer auto-braking and perform well in the testing.
Subaru's Legacy sedan and Outback wagon, with their so-called Eyesight system,
got the highest rating because they were the only vehicles to avoid crashes entirely
in both the 12 mph and 25 mph tests. Cadillac's Automatic Collision Preparation
System was next best. The Cadillac ATS sedan and SRX SUV both avoided a crash
at 12 mph and reduced the speed by more than 15 mph before crashing in the 25
mph test. The three other vehicles that achieved a superior rating are the
Mercedes-Benz C-Class sedan and the Volvo S60 sedan and XC60 SUV.
- Advanced: Models with this rating offer
forward collision warning combined with auto-braking, but performed less well
in the IIHS tests. Some of these systems, including Acura's Collision
Mitigation Brake System, are designed to slow the car down before a crash but
not avoid it entirely, according to the Institute. Vehicles with advanced
ratings include the 2014 Acura MDX SUV, Audi A4 sedan and Q5 SUV, 2014
Jeep Grand Cherokee SUV, Lexus ES sedan and 2014 Mazda 6 sedan.
- Basic: In this rating, a vehicle has a forward collision warning but no effective auto-braking. Each system must also meet criteria set out by the NHTSA of sounding a warning within a certain time before a crash. Twenty-five vehicles get this rating. (For a complete list, click here and scroll to the bottom of the table.) Some vehicles advertised as having auto-braking, such as the BMW 3 series and the Infiniti JX SUV, got a basic rating because they did not perform well enough in the tests.
Whatever the outcome of the litigation over these technologies, backup cameras -- already in 77 percent of 2013 models -- will be required on all new vehicles within a few years. And front crash warning and avoidance systems, in the pattern of all past safety features, will eventually spread even to less expensive cars. Some of the radar and video technology involved are even steps along the road to the driverless car.
Does this seem too much? Don’t people just need to be more careful? Maybe, but the “be more careful” warning doesn’t seem to be slowing people down nor decreasing the number of car accidents. If the technology exists and works, should car buyers be given the option? They can choose to pay for it or not, but, IF IT WORKS, then we are all safer with this technology on the road. It is not something that we want to rely on—safety still mandates attention and safe driving, but a little extra assistance to avoid accidents?
No objection here.